But if A achieves 70% of the target and B achieves 55% of the target, then A's assessment score will definitely be better than B? I'm afraid not necessarily.
Especially in the past two years, the country's economic growth has slowed down. Whether it is the Internet or physical enterprises, the news of layoffs is flying all over the sky. The slightly better ones are reluctantly maintained by freezing recruitment. At this time, everyone cannot achieve the goal. One situation abounds.
So, when everyone is reporting bad performance, how can we get better assessment results?
Before answering this question, we must first carefully Canadian Healthcare, Medical Email List analyze the psychological activities of the person who heard the bad news (that is, your boss).
You know, the most bad news reported now is layoffs. In ancient times, it was necessary to receive a lunch box every minute.
For example: in the Hippo War in the 5th century BC, the kings of Persia had a very famous habit, that is, they would reward the messengers who brought good news and kill all the messengers who brought bad news. In psychology, there is a term for this, called "Persian messenger syndrome" - that is, people tend to hate everything associated with bad news .
Charlie Munger also said: Hate is a psychological adjustment tool. It can make people lose sight of the virtues of their haters, and hate people, objects, and actions that remind them of their haters.
Similar to "Love the House and Wu", we also "hate the House and Wu".
We know that we conceal bad news in the workplace and do not report it, so how can we minimize the negative impact on ourselves when we report bad news to superiors in the workplace?